I am here seated and thinking about an interesting angle on Tate’s 2014 Turner Prize

I think it is amazing what time-lapse can cause to a particular cause. People complaint about the 80s, for instances, but it may not be the proclaimed principle. The main thing about it is that it worked on the subcultural level, with extreme levels of creativity to inform about a cause deserving our attention, a movement that advocated a deep commitment to support a socio-political whatsoever - being it a lesbian or gay cause, negritude or colonialism, or, even, Samantha Fox's completely dressed performance in 'Touch Me', which is still more social-cultural provocative than Miley Cyrus almost naked performances.

We need public interventions like those, when the questioning was also relevant, not the cynical entertainment that we are offered on a constant base, by the present days, of abstract ideas documenting our ordinary everyday life routines; go and redefine off so terrible moments. The abysmal thing to say, to transform a dull language, either it be about (gratuitous) images from nipples, dicks, vaginas, anus or a person's pubic hair… whatever! Do not want to trivialise, but this idea is packed of trivial topics. Definitely, if the 80s were whatever they were, the 00s and the 10s are worse!